United States

Littler Mendelson logo

As the largest labor and employment law firm in the United States—with more than 800 attorneys, 51 locations, and a practice that extends into every area and sub-area of workplace law—Littler Mendelson has the ability to provide rapid, integrated solutions for any labor, employment, benefits or global migration issue.

Littler’s international experience is long-standing and diverse, positioning us to effectively assist employers with the significant challenges of managing employees in multiple countries. Our international employment law practice consists of 100+ lawyers who have worked on projects involving the employment laws of nations across the globe. Our attorneys are fluent in 20+ languages and are actively involved in various international associations, such as the U.S. Council on International Business and the International Bar Association.

Supporting Littler's international employment law practice is a well-established network of working relationships with pre-eminent employment lawyers around the world. Littler is the U.S. member of the Ius Laboris global alliance of leading human resources law practitioners, with member firms in 45 countries and coverage in more than 100 countries.

Visit Website

Ninth Circuit Issues Its First Ruling Setting Forth the Elements for Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Claims

Posted on September 14, 2009 by Littler Mendelson
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX") protects employees of publicly traded companies from retaliation for providing information related to possible acts of fraud against shareholders. In Van Asdale v. International Game Technology, No. 07-16597 (9th Cir. 2009), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, addressing for the first time the substantive elements of a SOX whistleblower claim, ruled that employees do not have to prove that actual shareholder fraud has occurred to maintain such a suit. Rather, plaintiffs need only establish that they had an actual and objectively reasonable belief that shareholder fraud occurred. In addition, the Ninth Circuit held that concerns about the potential disclosure of attorney-client privileged information would not bar in-house attorneys from asserting SOX whistleblower claims. While the ruling is ultimately a conservative one that closely tracks the existing case law and regulations, it is an important decision for the Ninth Circuit. Continue reading "Ninth Circuit Issues Its First Ruling Setting Forth the Elements for Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Claims," written by Patrick H. Hicks and Deborah L. Westbrook.
Tags: Retaliation
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.globalemploymentlaw.com/mtc/mt-tb.cgi/277
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.