United Kingdom

Lewis Silkin logo

Lewis Silkin is a commercial law firm with offices in the City of London and Oxford in the UK with particular expertise in Employment & Incentives; Media, Brands & Technology; Corporate and Commercial; Real Estate and Litigation. With 50 partners and a total staff of around 270, we are large enough to handle major projects whilst remaining at a size that ensures that the work we do for clients will be treated with the priority and importance they expect. Our lawyers work in teams drawn from our specialist legal disciplines in order to provide a seamless service to clients.

Employment and incentives law has been a key area of expertise for Lewis Silkin for many years - it currently represents approximately 40% of our business. Our team of 68 dedicated employment and incentives specialists, including 16 partners, is consistently highly ranked by the legal directories and won 'Employment of the Year' at The Lawyer Awards 2008.

We provide international employment law advice through Ius Laboris, the global alliance of leading human resource lawyers, of which we are the chosen UK member.

Visit Website

Climate Change Can Found 'Philosophical Belief'

In Grainger plc and others v Nicholson, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that an employee's belief in man-made climate change, together with the alleged moral imperatives that entails, is capable of being a 'philosophical belief' for the purposes of discrimination law.

The claimant, Tim Nicholson, was head of sustainability at property investment company Grainger plc until he was made redundant last year.  He is claiming that his strong environmental principles put him at odds with other managers, prompting his dismissal.  An employment tribunal decided that his case could be considered under the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003, because it was based on a 'philosophical belief'.
 
The EAT has now upheld the ruling, rejecting the company's contention that environmental views were political and a 'lifestyle choice' that could not be compared to religion or philosophy.  Unless there is a further appeal to the Court of Appeal, Mr Nicholson's claim will now proceed to be heard on its merits.

This entry was written by Richard Lister

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.globalemploymentlaw.com/mtc/mt-tb.cgi/460
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end