Canada

Heenan Blaikie logo

Heenan Blaikie maintains Canada’s preeminent labour and employment law practice with over 120 lawyers in nine offices across the country providing responsive and impactful labour and employment law advise.

Heenan Blaikie represents a wide range of clients at the provincial, national and international levels. Our lawyers frequently chair and speak at conferences and are actively involved in employers’ organizations and with legal and human resource associations including the American Bar Association, the Society for Human Resource Management, and the Association of Corporate Counsel.

Heenan Blaikie maintains Canada’s largest and most sophisticated federal sector practice. Our lawyers are actively involved in all significant federal labour and employment law developments. Heenan Blaikie also maintains the first and best international labour law practice in Canada. Our lawyers regularly serve as delegates to the ILO and the Summit of Americas process and act as legal counsel to the official representative of Canadian employers on the international stage in respect of labour and employment matters.

Visit Website

Proposed Amendment to Lay-Off Provisions of Employment Standards Act, 2000

On December 10, 2009, Bill 239, An Act to amend the Employment Standards Act, 2000 with respect to lay-offs (pdf) was introduced.  If passed, the Bill would change the manner in which weeks without work are counted during a lay-off.  Under the Employment Standards Act, 2000, employees are deemed to have been terminated if the length of their lay-off exceeds a certain length in a given time period.  Currently, weeks that an employee is locked-out by his or her employer are excluded from that calculation.  Bill 239 would amend the Act so that the period of time that an employee is not working due to a lock-out is no longer excluded.
Tags: Lock-Out
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.globalemploymentlaw.com/mtc/mt-tb.cgi/612
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end