Global Employment Law - Global News & Commentary on Labor and Employment Issues Worldwide

The judgment concerned a contractual relationship with a self-employed plasterer. However, as the individual concerned had soldering training, he did not have adequate professional knowledge to plaster and accordingly, the contractual partner had to give him very precise guidelines on the work that was expected of him and the way it had to be done.

The Labour Court of Appeals of Antwerp decided that the existence of a subordinate relationship could be derived from the lack of freedom in the organization of work, but that this could not in itself lead to the exclusion of a self-employed status. The Labour Court of Appeals also stated that the monitoring undertaken by the contractual partner only concerned the quality of the work carried out.

The Supreme Court overruled the Labour Court of Appeals. It stated that the fact that the contractual partner gave precise guidelines and instructions because of the worker's lack of professional knowledge involved a greater level of supervision than the mere monitoring of the quality of the work carried out in a non-subordinated employment relationship. A lack of professional knowledge, combined with a lack of freedom in the organization of work (as the contractual partner needed instructions in order to carry out his work), is incompatible with a self-employed status.

This judgment suggests that particular care is required regarding a self-employed status in a situation where precise guidelines must be given to the worker and especially where he/she does not have adequate professional knowledge for the work involved.